Showing posts with label Theonomy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theonomy. Show all posts

Friday, September 08, 2006

New Covenant Theonomy? (part 2)

Ok, in my previous post: New Covenant Theonomy? I laid the foundation for the eternal, moral ethic (will, law) being the foundation for the law of Christ. In this post I plan to explain why the law of Christ; a rule in righteousness; is a theocratic rule.
The reason I say that I am a theonomist is because Christ’s Rule is by "Law."
Under this New Covenant (initial-stage of the prophetic kingdom [now and not yet theology] ), God’s Law has not been merely given to us as a standard, but has been written on our hearts by the Holy Spirit (Jer. 31:33; Ezekiel 36:27; cf. Rom. 7:6; 8:14).
This enshrinement of the eternal, moral Law written on the heart is different from the Natural Law revealed in creation (cf. Rom. 2:14-15). It is not that He is knowable – as in the Old Covenant (i.e. Rom. 1:20; 2:14-15), but that we know Him (cf. Jer. 31:34) – it is grace efficaciously applied to a sinner, transforming a God-hater (Rom. 1:30) into an incurable God-lover.
Therefore, in “this Age;” Christ’s righteousness has been imputed to us; by the Spirit, enabling us to obey the words of Christ – because we now have a new heart to do so – a Spirit empowered heart (cf. Ezekiel 36:26-27) i.e. walking in the Spirit (Gal. 5:16, 25). This may also be known as the “ethics of the kingdom” partially realized now (aka: law-fulfilling free people).
However, Christ’s (Davidic) kingdom (as expressed in both promise and law; aka the everlasting covenant) is realized in the new heavens and new earth (the Age to come).
Only then will Christ receive His just rewards (for His life and sacrifice) as king of the earth.
I would not consider this statement a capitulation to either CT or Reconstructionism. I would embrace much of what NCT believes on the fulfillment and the end of the Mosaic Covenant (a temporary covenant, which of course revealed something far greater).
Would love to hear from you . . .

Sunday, September 03, 2006

New Covenant Theonomy?

"Theonomy, is a term composed of the Greek roots theos (God) and nomos (law) refers to a theological movement that believes that God's Law (i.e., Israel's Law in the Old Testament) is an eternally binding standard in all ages and is to be applied by the believer for sanctification and enforced by the civil magistrate when so dictated."[1]
God's Law then serves as the ethics of this New Covenant (and by default human government). This is seen as a type of theocracy and is Covenant Theology's understanding of theonomy. It is associated with Christian Reconstructionism, and Dominion theology. My understanding of Theonomy is nottraditionalitonal view. I cannot agree that the "OT ethical standards are to be the norm for today," as they are revealed in the OT. Given my affair with NCT, I cannot agree wittraditionalitonal CT definition.
I agree with the guys at Christonomy.com that "this emphasis on the dominion of Christ in all of society to be thoroughly Biblical, but theonomyÂ’s application of the Mosaic Law in the present age represents a misunderstanding of the purpose of the Law in salvation-history . . . (the dominion of Christ is meant to) emphasizes God's absolute authority in all spheres of life, including culture and law, as well as an optimistic eschatology (seeing the) . . . essence of Christianity as the task of being God's instruments in bringing all things into submission to the authority of Christ."
They go further by saying that, the Mosaic "Law represents the terms of the Old Covenant, and has been forever made obsolete by the establishment of Christ's New Covenant, which brings about true obedience in the believer by the work of the Holy Spirit. This obedience is characterized by love for one's neighbor and love for God, and is at times referred to in the New Testament as fulfillment of the 'Law of Christ.' "

I beleive this, because I see the eternal, moral ethic (law, will) as a theme or maybe a constant throughout scripture; and, I'm not sure theology (at least as I see it, I know, very po-mo of me) can be understood without it.

What I mean to say is that 'Law' is a very defining aspect to God's eternal purpose / everlasting covenant.It is revealed in 1) creation, 2) the Law of Moses and 3) the Law Christ.
This is what Christ fulfilled; this is what was revealed in the Mosaic Covenant and creation. He, fulfilled this by living a life that was perfect, fulfilling all the demands of the Law (aka eternal, moral law), meriting by His active obedience and sacrifice of Himself (passive obedience) the blessing promised in the Old Covenant putting the covenant (Abrahamic) into effect (Heb. 9:16-18). Or more specifically the promised blessings of God's eternal purpose / everlasting covenant revealed in His covenant promises that began with Abraham and culminated in the resurrection.
In my next post on New Covenant Theonomy? I will explain how the 'law of Christ' is a theocratic rule.

[1] Sentence taken from Christonomy.com. See FAQ section.